<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Blog about Pharmaceutical Labeling | Medical Devices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prisymls.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prisymls.com</link>
	<description>Welcome to PRISYM ID’s blog, where we share our experiences with you from the life sciences marketplace. Our team will regularly discuss the types of issues they come across when working with some of the world’s largest medical device, pharmaceutical, healthcare and clinical trials companies. The blog covers news, events, opinion pieces and articles.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:04:55 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on What is GS1? by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.prisymls.com/white-papers/what-is-gs1/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisymls.com/_site_/?p=373#comment-605</guid>
		<description>The 2010 economic stimulus package aims at incenting more physician to adopt electronic medical records. The act promises incentive payments to those who adopt and use “certified EMRs” and, eventually, reducing Medicare payments to those who do not use lectronic health records .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2010 economic stimulus package aims at incenting more physician to adopt electronic medical records. The act promises incentive payments to those who adopt and use “certified EMRs” and, eventually, reducing Medicare payments to those who do not use lectronic health records .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is so difficult about pharmaceutical Serialization? by Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.prisymls.com/white-papers/what-is-so-difficult-about-pharmaceutical-serialization/comment-page-1/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 May 2010 23:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisymls.com/?p=459#comment-537</guid>
		<description>Excellent whitepaper! There is a huge misunderstanding in the US marketplace that since Serialization is not yet required by law and because there are no set standards Serialization is not yet a necessary initiative.  Starting a Serialization initiative now is both morally and financially responsible. It has both hard and soft benefits and it provides a migration path to any compliance standard in the future.  

Obviously, having a tighter supply chain has an obvious ROI especially in terms of shrinkage and returns.  But the soft benefits are where a company can realize astronomical and often immeasurable returns.  The global threat of counterfeit drugs is obviously already out of control.  It hurts the brand, the creditability of the company, it takes money directly out of the pockets of each and every employee of the company and it hurts the community. Counterfeit drugs are essentially mass murder and economic terrorism.  There is also the threat of lawsuits from the customer it hurts.  Already, the US has seen the first court case brought against two drug companies for allegedly failing to act to protect customers over fake drugs.  Both companies settled out of court, apparently for US$72 million. 

There are already customers in many less developed countries who do not trust certain brands of drugs as a result of counterfeits and this has happened here in the US as well. Much of what is purchased online here in the US from “so called” Canadian online pharmacies are counterfeit. In fact, over 50 percent of the shipments coming into the US from online drug sales from these companies that call themselves Canadian based are actually coming from South America, China, Pakistan and several other places that would surprise you.  And ~23 percent of these drugs are counterfeit!  The origins of these drugs are often rogue countries such as the DPRK.  

Organized crime syndicates, drug cartels and even terrorist organizations have turned to this lucrative market because of the simplicity of making fakes, the low risk of getting caught and the lax penalties.  As an example, counterfeiting money in China is punishable by death while counterfeiting drugs has a maximum fine of 500RMB (~$73.00 USD) – all this at the expense of our company’s brands, our drug discovery, the money it steals from our economy and of course the consumer that it often kills.  

Fake drugs have become more deadly than terrorism.  Forty years of terrorism has killed ~65,000 people, compared with ~200,00 in one year alone in China from counterfeit drugs.  This is obviously an important topic and we can no longer “wait” for the FDA or anyone else to tell us when we should do this – As i said, starting an initiative now is both morally and financially responsible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent whitepaper! There is a huge misunderstanding in the US marketplace that since Serialization is not yet required by law and because there are no set standards Serialization is not yet a necessary initiative.  Starting a Serialization initiative now is both morally and financially responsible. It has both hard and soft benefits and it provides a migration path to any compliance standard in the future.  </p>
<p>Obviously, having a tighter supply chain has an obvious ROI especially in terms of shrinkage and returns.  But the soft benefits are where a company can realize astronomical and often immeasurable returns.  The global threat of counterfeit drugs is obviously already out of control.  It hurts the brand, the creditability of the company, it takes money directly out of the pockets of each and every employee of the company and it hurts the community. Counterfeit drugs are essentially mass murder and economic terrorism.  There is also the threat of lawsuits from the customer it hurts.  Already, the US has seen the first court case brought against two drug companies for allegedly failing to act to protect customers over fake drugs.  Both companies settled out of court, apparently for US$72 million. </p>
<p>There are already customers in many less developed countries who do not trust certain brands of drugs as a result of counterfeits and this has happened here in the US as well. Much of what is purchased online here in the US from “so called” Canadian online pharmacies are counterfeit. In fact, over 50 percent of the shipments coming into the US from online drug sales from these companies that call themselves Canadian based are actually coming from South America, China, Pakistan and several other places that would surprise you.  And ~23 percent of these drugs are counterfeit!  The origins of these drugs are often rogue countries such as the DPRK.  </p>
<p>Organized crime syndicates, drug cartels and even terrorist organizations have turned to this lucrative market because of the simplicity of making fakes, the low risk of getting caught and the lax penalties.  As an example, counterfeiting money in China is punishable by death while counterfeiting drugs has a maximum fine of 500RMB (~$73.00 USD) – all this at the expense of our company’s brands, our drug discovery, the money it steals from our economy and of course the consumer that it often kills.  </p>
<p>Fake drugs have become more deadly than terrorism.  Forty years of terrorism has killed ~65,000 people, compared with ~200,00 in one year alone in China from counterfeit drugs.  This is obviously an important topic and we can no longer “wait” for the FDA or anyone else to tell us when we should do this – As i said, starting an initiative now is both morally and financially responsible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What is GS1? by Bell Matacale</title>
		<link>http://www.prisymls.com/white-papers/what-is-gs1/comment-page-1/#comment-522</link>
		<dc:creator>Bell Matacale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 23:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisymls.com/_site_/?p=373#comment-522</guid>
		<description>Very informative article post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative article post.Thanks Again. Much obliged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Threat From Generics Increases Brand Focus by Lyn @ florist gifts</title>
		<link>http://www.prisymls.com/medical-labeling/prisym-medica/threat-from-generics-increases-brand-focus/comment-page-1/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyn @ florist gifts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisymls.com/blog/?p=160#comment-251</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been inquiring the World Wide Web for my research on this subject field. I&#039;m so grateful what you shared brings a new proportion to the data I&#039;m collecting. I really appreciate the way which you look at this subject field, it offer me a unusual way of seeing at it now. Thanks for the share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been inquiring the World Wide Web for my research on this subject field. I&#8217;m so grateful what you shared brings a new proportion to the data I&#8217;m collecting. I really appreciate the way which you look at this subject field, it offer me a unusual way of seeing at it now. Thanks for the share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Efficient is Your Clinical Trial Supplies Labeling Operation? by Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.prisymls.com/life-sciences-news/industry-news/how-efficient-is-your-clinical-trial-supplies-labelling-operation/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisymls.com/blog/?p=202#comment-210</guid>
		<description>I added your blog to bookmarks. And i&#039;ll read your articles more often!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I added your blog to bookmarks. And i&#8217;ll read your articles more often!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Efficient is Your Clinical Trial Supplies Labeling Operation? by Ventego</title>
		<link>http://www.prisymls.com/life-sciences-news/industry-news/how-efficient-is-your-clinical-trial-supplies-labelling-operation/comment-page-1/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>Ventego</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 00:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisymls.com/blog/?p=202#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Very interesting and amusing subject. I read with great pleasure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting and amusing subject. I read with great pleasure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Efficient is Your Clinical Trial Supplies Labeling Operation? by Mackeran</title>
		<link>http://www.prisymls.com/life-sciences-news/industry-news/how-efficient-is-your-clinical-trial-supplies-labelling-operation/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Mackeran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisymls.com/blog/?p=202#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Interesting and informative. But will you write about this one more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting and informative. But will you write about this one more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How Efficient is Your Clinical Trial Supplies Labeling Operation? by Clemento</title>
		<link>http://www.prisymls.com/life-sciences-news/industry-news/how-efficient-is-your-clinical-trial-supplies-labelling-operation/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Clemento</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 06:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisymls.com/blog/?p=202#comment-200</guid>
		<description>I really like your blog and i respect your work. I&#039;ll be a frequent visitor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like your blog and i respect your work. I&#8217;ll be a frequent visitor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Your Labeling System Really by Bob Tilling</title>
		<link>http://www.prisymls.com/labeling-regulations/compliance/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Tilling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 08:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisymls.com/blog/?p=78#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Labelling is one of the top areas companies fail an FDA audit. As a consultant on FDA 21 CFR Part 11 compliance I have dealt with this exact scenario many times. Your presentation reflects my own experience of the most common areas for failure within the labelling process.

In my opinion custom in-house designed labelling solutions based on general labelling software present a far higher compliance risk to Life Science companies compared to using purpose designed FDA Compliant labelling software</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labelling is one of the top areas companies fail an FDA audit. As a consultant on FDA 21 CFR Part 11 compliance I have dealt with this exact scenario many times. Your presentation reflects my own experience of the most common areas for failure within the labelling process.</p>
<p>In my opinion custom in-house designed labelling solutions based on general labelling software present a far higher compliance risk to Life Science companies compared to using purpose designed FDA Compliant labelling software</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
