Archive for the ‘PRISYM Medica’ Category

The ABC’s of IQ, OQ, and PQ?

LOL, and OMG….today everyone knows what these internet slang terms mean and how to use them.

If you are reading this blog you may also be familiar with Medical Device and Life Sciences specific acronyms for example IQ, OQ, and PQ. For those who are new to the very specific world of Life Sciences, we’ll try to debunk the myths around some of the terminology.

So what is meant by IQ, OQ, and PQ? They are terms that fall under the category of validation and verification.

IQ stands for “Installation Qualification”. The IQ records the installation of the software, and ensures that the installation follows the correct steps.

OQ stands for “Operational Qualification”. The OQ tests or qualifies that the solution is working using test data in general. This maps across to the requirements stated in the Functional Specification, and ensures the product or application meets all the predetermined requirements as stated.

PQ stands for “Performance Qualification” which means that the application, under real life conditions, consistently produces products which meet all predetermined requirements. The PQ is the final test before production (potentially the most important test document you will ever run), testing that the solution works fully in the live environment using live data, and should be based back on a workflow model from your User Requirements Specification.

On top of the IQ/OQ/PQ, you should ensure that you have other key documents including The Validation Master. This will form the detail and coverage of the documentation that you need.

Last thought for the day is that validation requires documented evidence, if the validation process is not documented then it cannot be proven to have occurred. Put another way, your regulatory body will view your validation process as solely a ‘rumour’.

The Dreaded FDA Warning Letter – What it Means and What to Do

For those of you in the business of manufacturing medical devices or pharmaceuticals, you know all about the importance of following FDA regulations. If, after an FDA audit or inspection, you are found to be out of compliance, you could receive a Warning Letter or an Untitled Letter.

An Untitled Letter is basically a way of citing a violation that does not meet the threshold of regulatory significance for a Warning Letter. A Warning Letter is the most serious of FDA letters, but it’s important to note that it’s not a form of FDA enforcement action. Instead a Warning Letter is just as the name suggests – a ‘warning’ that, if certain corrections or changes are not made, the FDA could take further action.

The intention of the letters is to bring about voluntary compliance without committing the FDA to taking enforcement action. Although there is no immediate enforcement on the part of the FDA, they do expect recipients to make the necessary changes and voluntarily comply with the law. Since Warning Letters are made public under the Freedom of Information Act, it can be helpful to review warnings given to others in an effort to avoid making the same mistakes.

If you do receive a Warning Letter, there is normally a short window (typically 15 days) in which to issue a response to the FDA. The response should include:

1. the steps that have been or will be taken to correct the violations and prevent similar violations;
2. the timeframe within which the corrections will be completed;
3. any reason the corrective action has not been completed within the response time; and,
4. any documentation that shows that correction is complete.

The amount of change that needs to take place to ‘close out’ a warning varies depending upon the violation. If the Warning Letter is in reference to misleading promotional activities, it could be as simple as discontinuing the use of an ad campaign. If, on the other hand, the violation has to do with the manufacturing process of a drug or medical device, there could be a long list of corrective actions that need to be taken. And it may take some time to address them all. In these cases the FDA may decide to withhold certain types of approvals until the issues have been rectified.

Once the violations have been corrected, a Close-Out Letter is issued. This is the official acknowledgement from the FDA that the violations outlined in the Warning Letter no longer exist.

We’d like to hear about your experiences with FDA letters. Have you ever received a Warning Letter? How long did it take before the issue was ‘closed out’?

FDA UDI Regulations – An Updated Look at the Timeline

In June 2010 PRISYM ID hosted a webinar titled, “Tips for Implementing FDA UDI without Derailing Production”. Featured speakers included Jay Crowley from the FDA and Janice Kite from the GS1 Global Office. The webinar gave an overview of UDI (Unique Device Identification) in practical terms and went through the planned timeline for proposed FDA UDI regulations.

Now that a year has passed, we thought it would be beneficial to provide you with an updated timeline around FDA UDI. While nothing is official, the following is the most recent information on how the FDA UDI rollout might look:

12 Months after the FDA UDI Standard is Published (2013)

The first set of deadlines focus on Class III Medical Devices. These are devices that support or sustain human life, are of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health, or present a potential unreasonable risk of illness or injury to the patient, such as implantable pacemakers, replacement heart valves, automated external defibrillators, and implants.

• UDI will apply to all levels of packaging
• An engraved UDI may be required for some Class III medical devices
• If a device has a serial number, the UDI will also be serialized

36 Months after the FDA UDI Standard is Published (2015)

The next class of medical devices to be effected is Class II, which are items like x-ray systems, gas analyzers, pumps, and surgical drapes.

• UDI will apply to all levels of packaging

60 Months after the FDA UDI Standard is Published (2017)

The final group is Class I Medical Devices, such as tongue depressors, arm slings, examination gloves, and hand-held surgical instruments.

• UDI will probably just apply to the device (not packaging)

Medical devices are classified by intended use and potential risk to the patient, and as you can see from the timeline above, the UDI regulations address the most critical devices first. The years listed are based on the FDA UDI standard being published in 2012, which is the current plan. Stay tuned!

IQPC Pharmaceutical Serialization and Traceability 2011 – Geneva

We are looking forward to attending IQPC’s Pharmaceutical Serialization and Traceability conference coming to Geneva in November. The conference will focus on topics that are very important to us, such as patient safety and anti-counterfeiting.
One of the featured speakers for the event, Janice Kite, Director Healthcare Traceability for GS1, participated in our “Tips for Implementing FDA UDI without Derailing Production” webinar. At the Geneva event, Janice’s presentation, “Traceability and Product Serialization Standards and Harmonization”, will cover key worldwide regulatory and industry developments, GS1 Standards for Healthcare, how GS1 standards assist in compliance to the Directive for Falsified Medicines and the standardization strategy across Europe and Internationally.
The conference will also have industry speakers from the EFPIA, APB and PGEU, GIRP and HIBC as well as from manufacturers AstraZeneca, Roche, Boehringer-Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Daiichi-Sankyo and Abbott Laboratories.
If you are planning to attend this event, be sure to use ‘19085.002Prisym’ to get a 20% discount on the standard conference prices. You can register in one of three ways:

Go online: http://www.pharmaserialisation.com/Prisym
Call: +44 (0)207 368 9300
Email: enquire@iqpc.co.uk

What is EFPIA?

The European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations (EFPIA) represent the pharmaceutical industry operating in Europe. (more…)

What is UDI ?

The FDA’s mandate for Unique Device Identification (UDI) of medical devices aims to offer a practical solution which proposes a standard way of presenting standard information in a standard format or barcode. (more…)